June 10, 2026 USTFA

House Passes FY27 Agriculture Appropriations Bill, Securing Vital Funding for USDA Office of Seafood

The U.S. House of Representatives recently passed the Fiscal Year (FY) 2027 Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act (H.R. 8646) in a narrow 213-210 vote. For our domestic aquaculture and commercial fishing industries, the bill brings highly anticipated legislative momentum, maintaining federal funding for the newly formed U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Office of Seafood and introducing measures to protect domestic producers from unfair foreign competition.

Sustained Funding for the USDA Office of Seafood

A primary victory for the seafood sector in this legislation is the allocation of $500,000 for the USDA Office of Seafood. This office was officially launched in April following its initial establishment under the FY26 budget cycle, an achievement heavily championed by a broad coalition of seafood and aquaculture organizations.

Historically, the domestic seafood sector has operated on an uneven playing field compared to traditional terrestrial agriculture, lacking dedicated advocacy and structural access to the massive suite of financial services, loans, and promotional programs administered by the USDA. The creation and continued funding of the Office of Seafood represents a fundamental shift toward federal parity. At its launch, Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins noted the historical omission, emphasizing that for the first time, the USDA will house a dedicated team to elevate and support the nation’s “farmers of the sea.”

Surplus Purchasing and Support for Domestic Production

In addition to keeping the Office of Seafood funded, the House committee report directs the USDA’s Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) to leverage its Section 32 authority to execute more surplus purchases of domestic seafood products. Section 32 allows the federal government to buy domestic surplus commodities and redirect them into public initiatives like school lunch programs and food banks.

The committee explicitly recognized the severe economic headwinds squeezing domestic producers – including unfair trade practices from abroad, volatile input costs, and natural disasters. The report specifically encourages the USDA to prioritize purchases that bolster American aquaculture producers, fishermen, and regional processors, ensuring that high-quality, domestic marine proteins are integrated into federal nutrition assistance networks.

Stricter Defenses Against Foreign Imports and Misleading Labels

Addressing long-standing supply chain and market integrity challenges, the House bill includes several defensive provisions for domestic producers:

  • Ban on Chinese Seafood: The legislation maintains strict stipulations from the prior year, prohibiting federal funds from being used to purchase Chinese seafood for federal school lunch or breakfast programs.
  • Increased Import Inspection Funding: The bill includes a $10 million boost for testing seafood imports, alongside a directive that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) spend no less than $15 million specifically on the oversight of foreign seafood manufacturing facilities and examinations of imported seafood products.
  • Addressing Plant-Based Alternatives: The Appropriations Committee reinforced its stance against the labeling of plant-based products using seafood terms, identifying the practice as “misleading, deceptive, and confusing to consumers” and demanding clearer standards to protect the integrity of genuine seafood products.

Next Steps in the Legislative Process

While the passage of H.R. 8646 is a significant step forward, the budget must still clear the next phase of the legislative pipeline. The bill now heads to the U.S. Senate, which has yet to release its version of the FY27 agriculture appropriations package.

Skip to content